This course remembers completed sections and your last course page in this browser on this device. RayAI does not receive this progress or anything you write. Unfinished answers and written responses are not saved, so an interrupted activity restarts when you return.
CAPSTONE | 45 MINUTES COMPLETE / 20 MINUTES FAST TRACK
Build and test a Trust-First prompt workflow
Capstone steps
1. Choose the task. Write what you want to accomplish, who will use the answer, who must make the final decision, and what could go wrong if the answer is incorrect.
2. Run your first prompt. Open your AI assistant, enter your original prompt, send it, and save the answer.
3. Write an improved prompt. Make the task, needed facts, and output clear. Add the audience, limits, purpose, and checking instructions that your task needs. Tell the AI what to do when information is missing.
4. Run the improved prompt. Compare the new answer with the first answer. Write one improvement and one remaining problem.
5. Check one important fact, number, source, promise, or missing detail using an authoritative source, reliable calculation, or qualified person.
6. Improve the prompt once more. Change only the instruction needed to fix one problem you actually observed, then run it again.
7. Decide what to do. Choose: Use it / Improve it again / Ask a qualified person / Do not use it. Explain your choice.
Completed example
Task: Turn planning notes into a one-page Community Skills Night plan that helps the organizer identify what must be confirmed before invitations are drafted.
SOURCE NOTES
WEAK PROMPT
PROMPT v2
Independent verification: The organizer contacts the venue through an official channel to confirm capacity and accessibility, and records the response before outreach.
Targeted revision after testing: The first output listed Maya as the event speaker. Add: 'Maya offered only to contact possible speakers; do not identify her as a speaker.'
Decision: Keep the revised plan as an internal draft. Do not create or send invitations until venue, date, accessibility, consent, and recipient authority are confirmed.
Capstone rubric
| Criterion | 0 - Missing | 1 - Partial | 2 - Strong |
|---|---|---|---|
| Purpose and owner | No real outcome or owner | Outcome or owner is vague | Outcome, audience, decision, owner, and consequence are clear |
| Prompt design | Task is vague | Some useful elements | Task, context, output, audience, boundaries, purpose, and quality fit the risk |
| Evidence | No source rule | Sources named but gaps unclear | Evidence boundary, missing-information behavior, and source traceability are explicit |
| Privacy and safety | Sensitive/action risks ignored | Some caution but incomplete | Data minimized; high-stakes and action controls are appropriate |
| Verification | No check | Self-check only | At least one material item is checked independently with a suitable method |
| Iteration and decision | No revision or human decision | Revision is broad or decision unclear | One diagnosed failure drives a targeted revision and responsible decision |
Your capstone record
Finish this capstone
Mark this capstone complete when you have attempted every activity you intend to complete and reviewed your work against the v0.5 guidance.